Like most websites, we use cookies to make our website function properly and improve our services. You can read how to manage and delete cookies here or accept cookies by continuing to browse our website as usual and clicking the Continue button to remove this message.

Inside Investor Relations


Investors want light shed on digital intruders

Comments (0) | 27 Feb 2013 | RatingRating (-1 to +1): 0.0 | Print

Zogby Analytics poll finds investors are also demanding more transparency


Companies loathe disclosing cyber-attacks. Beyond the effect on stock price, estimating the cost and materiality of economic espionage can be problematic and just as humiliating as admitting to breaches of customer data.

With the US government pushing for increased sharing of threat information from the private sector, a new Zogby Analytics poll finds investors are also demanding more transparency about corporate cyber-security.

Commissioned by Sacramento-based ‘incident response solution provider’ HBGary, the nationwide survey of more than 400 US investors finds two thirds of them feel corporate responses to cyber-attacks are more noteworthy than the actual attack.

In addition, more than 70 percent of US investors are interested in reviewing public company cyber-security practices and nearly 80 percent would most likely not consider investing in a company with a history of cyber-attacks.  

‘This survey proves that today’s investors are more educated about the damage cyber-attacks can cause to a company’s brand and financial bottom line,’ says Ken Silva, senior vice president of cyber-strategy for HBGary parent ManTech International Corporation in a press release. ‘The high cost of cyber-attacks cannot be underestimated’.

The survey also reveals two thirds of investors are likely to research whether a company has been fined or sanctioned for previous cyber-security incidents. Investors are almost twice as concerned about companies that have had a breach of customer data (57 percent) as they are about theft of intellectual property (29 percent).

Meanwhile, a recent University of Texas study finds investors in internet firms are more likely to react negatively to public media revelations of cyber-security breaches than investors in non-internet firms. The paper’s author argues that’s because investors hold internet company managers to a higher standard in implementing effective countermeasures.

ir-registration ir-subscribe
Rating (-1 to +1): 0.0

You must be signed-in to rate this article

Reader Comments (0)

Be the first to comment and kickstart the debate!

You must be registered to comment.

Please Sign In or Register.

About Q4 Web Systems
Q4 Web Systems is the leader in corporate websites and social media solutions for public companies. Hundreds of investor relations’ professionals rely on Q4 for their IR website, social media and mobile applications. Using Q4, public companies of all sizes increase awareness, reduce risk and build better relationships with their investors.

Watch a video to see how Q4 helps make Investor Relations easier and more powerful.

Download this white paper from Q4 Web Systems to find out how public companies are using Facebook for investor relations.

Monthly IR poll

Ask the Expert on the following topic

Featured Articles

Goalward bound: The IR strategic plan
IR consultants reveal their top tips for writing the perfect strategic plan
More

Short list revealed Brazil 2013 awards
Gala event recognizes the best in investor relations across Brazil
More

IR Magazine
Find out what appeared in the June 2013 edition of IR magazine
More